Jonjo Shelvey was found guilty on his misconduct charge, as revealed by The FA earlier today.

This saw Newcastle United then quickly release an official statement saying that they were waiting until they saw the FA’s written reasons before deciding on any potential appeal or comment.

Wolves have now produced their own official statement, saying that they ‘welcome the verdict’.

Even though he is not mentioned in any of these statements, it is believed to be Moroccan midfielder Romain Saiss who was the player alleged to have been abused by Jonjo Shelvey.

Wolves Official Statement:

‘Decision reached on Jonjo Shelvey misconduct charge.

Wolves welcome the verdict following the FA’s investigation into an allegation of abusive and/or insulting words towards one of the club’s players in the fixture at Newcastle United in September.

The FA statement following the investigation reads:

‘Jonjo Shelvey has been given a five-match suspension and £100,000 fine after an FA misconduct charge against him was found proven.

‘The Newcastle United player was charged with using abusive and/or insulting words towards an opponent in the 87th minute of the game against Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday 17 September 2016.

‘It was further alleged that this breach of Rule E3(1) was an “Aggravated Breach” as defined in Rule E3(2), as it included reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or nationality.

‘The player, who denied the charge at an Independent Regulatory Commission hearing, was also ordered to attend an FA education course.

‘The sanction has been set aside pending consideration for an appeal. Any appeal must be lodged within seven days from receipt of written reasons which will be produced in due course.’

Official Newcastle United Statement:

Jonjo Shelvey has been given a five-match suspension and £100,000 fine after an FA misconduct charge against him was found proven.

Jonjo was charged with using abusive and/or insulting words towards an opponent in the 87th minute of the game against Wolverhampton Wanderers on Saturday, 17th September 2016.

It was further alleged that this breach of Rule E3(1) was an “Aggravated Breach” as defined in Rule E3(2), as it included reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or nationality.

The player, who denied the charge at an Independent Regulatory Commission hearing, was also ordered to attend an FA education course.

The sanction has been set aside pending consideration for an appeal.  The player has seven days from receipt of written reasons in which to lodge any appeal.

The club and the player will await the FA’s written reasons before making any further comment on this matter.’